Idea: Phone Newscaster

Idea: Phone Newscaster

Apr 22, 2013

A handle that plugs into any smart phone from the bottom and takes control of microphone and video capturing capabilities as well as record/pause function with camera switch capability (front cam/back cam). This product comes with its own editing software that allows adding preset titles and end credits as well as second and third audio track overlay on editing timeline. The pause of video “waits” even for several hours without draining the battery even if the phone is turned off between video takes. Once the video is captured, the user can upload footage unedited to YouTube or any other platform (using phone’s LTE or Wi-Fi connectivity), or add additional audio tracks in its editor.

Price? The handle/app combo could easily be sold for $1500

The second version of this product includes optical lens attachment with optical zoom. Also, multi-cam capability where record/pause can be swapped between host phone and the child one using personal Wi-Fi connectivity between them.

What are your thoughts on this concept?

Email This Page

No face-blur plugin?

No face-blur plugin?

Feb 10, 2013

It is year 2013, and I just realized that there is no face blur plugin for any video editing software, I use Adobe Premiere Pro CS6. It is a shame really. In the world where more and more people take pictures or videos in public, I am truly surprised that there is no easy automated solution for face-blur. Google has been having this technology in its street-view for years now. How come there is no such plugin? Here is a video where this guy talks about how to do it manually in Adobe Premiere Pro CS6. He talks for 8 minutes, that’s a long time to invest for a little thing like face-blur..

All it requires is video analysis applied for face recognition in video editing software, just like what consumer camcorders and still cameras recognize faces. It shouldn’t be a time-consuming task for a video editor, like the way Adobe Premiere approaches extracting subtitle text from the audio in the timeline, takes very long and results may vary on the quality of the audio. A face is a face, it is very distinct compared to anything else happening in a given video frame. Yes, low light may be the enemy of a precise face recognition but then it’s kind of meaningless to apply face-blur when it’s hard to see the face in the dark anyway. I say, the time has come video plugin developers to look into this.

Update May 3rd, 2013:
I recently discovered NVeiler Video Filter. Costing around $32, it is an automated face detection/blur plugin for VirtualDub (Free video editing software). Though it is refreshing to see automatic face recognition and burring in video-editing software, VirtualDub is not mainstream user-friendly video-editng solution. It would be great to see NVeiler Video Filter plugin available for Adobe Premiere Pro as well as FinalCut and other frequently used video-editing programs.

Email This Page

What kinds of people have figured out how to get a high-quality but low-cost lifestyle?

What kinds of people have figured out how to get a high-quality but low-cost lifestyle?

Jan 23, 2013

Hipsters? Couponers? Extreme Retirees? Expats? Who’s living the good life with minimal spending?

ANSWERS:
Katie Bremer, Frugal! Me!

I’m no an expert at this, but…Successful Digital Nomads have it figured out.

I’ve been making enough money through writing and editing that I can move around and live where I want, as long as I keep my spending down.

In the last year, I’ve lived in the Bosque, Mexico City, Cleveland, Chicago, and now Austin.

As Paul notes for engineers, the same is true for most digital nomads. I need my phone and my computer, and, if traveling outside the USA, I need my passport. I need a week’s worth of clothes; ideally two. I need an equipped kitchen.

Seriously. That’s it. When my roommate picked me up from the airport a week ago, she surveyed my luggage and said, “Is this everything?!?!”

I separate ‘needs’ and ‘wants’. I have a high quality laptop and a high quality phone. I buy high quality footwear and ‘base’ clothes. Other than that, I do thrift store purchases, or skip buying stuff all together.

I’m new to this, and not perfect at it, so I’m curious how others make it work.


Brian Dunlap, I work on a series of tubes.
Is there a term for people like me?  Perhaps “Reformed Low-Quality, High-Cost Lifestyle People”?My story:
I was fortunate to find myself making fairly good money at a relatively early age.  Mind you, I had some years, immediately following college, that involved considerable struggling as well.

Some 8 years ago, though, I was making a decent salary, with the occasional bonus and dividend but still nothing approaching remarkable.  However, my expenses were low – I was single, had no dependents, lived in a modest apartment, drove a car that was paid off.  I was comfortable.  I avoided outrageous expenses, but never really found myself wanting.

Then I landed a pretty sweet job and my income blew up.  Things got to the point where I was paying more in income taxes than I’d grossed in years prior.This new job required relocating to a different part of the country, where I moved in to a huge waterfront home.  Eventually, I had 2 Porsches, traveled to Europe frequently (always flying first or business, and developed fairly snooty tastes.  And hey… it was fun.  But I was spending like wild (though still had money to spare).  Oh, I’m not wealthy by any means.  I’m not talking millions or anything near it.  But, not having kids and such, I had a decent income and a considerable portion of that income could be applied towards discretionary spending.

I think my father’s words of wisdom kept ringing in my head, though (he had always made good money, while at the same time being quite frugal)  Every time I sent off a car payment that was larger than most peoples’ mortgage payments, it bothered me a bit.  I kept thinking to myself my home was way too big and a waste of space; as silly as it was to spend all the money I was spending on cars, I’d see others’ even more outrageous vehicles and find fault with their spending (“You bought a Turbo but didn’t get the manual transmission?!  You put *those* rims on a Bentley?!  What practical reason is there to have that painting?!”).  I’d have to say my expenses were nagging me – and I almost began to resent my lifestyle more than enjoy it.  I couldn’t take compliments – if someone would say something nice about my house or comment on the view, I’d think things like, “Yeah, but you should see the utility bills! And it has no character or charm!”.

Last year, I essentially became “over it”.  I got sick of wasting money.  Admittedly, I probably got caught up in some of the election hype and all this talk of class warfare and what not, but I’d already  been progressing towards getting totally sick of spending money on useless things.  It was just a matter of thoughts translating in to action.

  • I got rid of the fancy European cars (after calculating that I’d essentially been spending $2-4/mile driven when adding up car payments, insurance, gas, maintenance, registration, etc).
  • I bought a used hybrid.
  • I started collecting and cutting coupons.
  • I joined rewards programs.
  • I started paying attention to sales, discount offers, promotions.
  • I prioritized trips to visit family over wild vacations overseas.
  • I started tracking expenses (with various apps and programs like Quicken and Mint).
  • I set budgets.
  • I seek out fee-free ATMs like they cure cancer.

Some of my friends think I’m a bit crazy for making what I do, while obsessively cutting coupons.  I counter their criticisms with the numbers, though.  Essentially, I save through coupons the cost of a pretty sweet MacBook Pro – would anyone turn down a free MacBook Pro?

My little hybrid turns no heads and sure as hell doesn’t get me laid.  I no longer get parked up front when I valet (in no small part because I stopped valeting, as well).  But I went from spending $200-$300/month on gas to around $40.  If someone came up and offered to give you $250/ month just for the hell of it, would you turn it down?  Replacing the sports cars with the hybrid literally left me with thousands of extra dollars in my pocket every month.  Beyond that, though, it had an odd effect on me mentally.  With the sports cars, I felt compelled to be the first off the line at every stop light.  I frequently found myself getting cut off because I was always racing around everywhere; I’d speed, feeling like I had to go everywhere fast and getting frustrated at other drivers who were too damn slow or kept getting in my way.  Now, though, my commutes are pretty relaxing affairs – I’m content to cruise along at the speed limit, drive in a way that maximizes fuel efficiency, and never get road rage or stressed out on the freeway.  People don’t get in my way because… well… there is no real “my” way.  What’s more, now I’m actually quite eager to get the dogs in to the car and head over to the park to play around, or just drive ‘em around on errands.  With my old cars, I was always too freaked out they’d scratch the leather or get hair everywhere.

Keep in mind – there is a certain unwelcome aspect to these lifestyle changes.Certain people expect you to live a certain way.  Sometimes, I feel my counterparts at a business meeting are a little less impressed when I pull up in a modest hybrid, as opposed to some high-power import.  Certain people interpret frugality as weakness – perhaps I’m not cost-conscious so much as just broke and struggling?  If you circulate among a certain type of people, the expectation could be that everyone spends lots of money (“Hey!  Let’s go to the Keys next month!  Let’s meet for dinner at Joel Robuchon [ Traditional French Cuisine : MGM Grand Hotel & Casino ]“).  You don’t want to cut off relationships, but must also refrain from certain indulgences your peers are eager to engage in.

I don’t like to think of myself as cutting out all the fun and being a miser, though.  Rather, I characterize my lifestyle changes as prioritizing experiences over possessions.  So I’ll still spend money that one more cost-conscious than me might prefer to save or invest, but I’ll do it on Christmas gifts for loved ones rather than an Oriental rug for the dining room.  I’ll visit family and stay in the guest room rather than that nice hotel in town, further making the most of even more time spent together by taking everyone out to dinner.  I’ll still travel, but focus on what gets done while abroad and making the most of the experience, rather than wasting money on outrageous hotel rooms or freely drinking $15 sodas out of the minibar.  And when in that strange, foreign city, I’ll walk everywhere and take in the sights, rather than spend money on a taxi.

“Just because you have money, doesn’t mean you need to spend money”, my father would always say. It took awhile, but I finally picked up on that.I could lose every possession tomorrow, but memories of fantastic experiences aren’t going anywhere.  Practically, spending wisely now is an investment in the future as well.  I may not have a partner’s social security to supplement years from now, and I definitely won’t have adult children who’ll help look after me in my old age.  As an unmarried gay man, preparing for retirement is entirely up to me.


Michael O. Church, NYC machine learning functional programming.
Material needs and desires tend to exhibit a Maslovian Hierarchy of Needs.

  • Survival. Food, clothing, shelter, electricity, ability to get to work, health care.
  • Leisure. This is “freedom-to”, such as travel, interesting books to read, access to live entertainment, and the ability to eat at restaurants on a fairly regular basis.
  • Comfort. This is “freedom-from”, which involves not having to do your own cleaning, flying first-class if you travel frequently, and having a nanny so you can have kids and a social life. It also usually requires getting a job where you actually enjoy going to work, because typical jobs are themselves uncomfortable.
  • Status. Most people lack the talent to max out Comfort without getting some kind of social edge that makes them “important” to other people. They need jobs with low responsibility and, in effect, access to the private social welfare network (limitless investment for stupid ideas, corporate board positions, sinecures) that rich people have. This requires playing a social status game that outsiders find pointless and destructive (and they’re right).
  • Power. This is the ability to improve or decrease others’ Status, once you’ve shored up your own and you’re bored and need something new to screw with. You need millions to play at this level in a material way.

Survival, Leisure, and Comfort all have hedonic returns, with decreasing importance for each. Leisure is more important than Comfort because most people can’t stand to be bored and would rather tolerate transient pain and discomfort in pursuit of something they enjoy (as on a long bike ride). Comfort becomes important when people start wanting to “purify” experience, because they’re no longer satisfied with the coarser experiences most people have (bland hotels, coach air travel). While important, Comfort is hard to max out because people just find increasingly trivial things to get pissed off about.

When you start chasing Status and Power, this pursuit makes you unhappy. The well-connected, stressed-out businessman shouting “I’m going to rape your shit for breakfast!” at a subordinate or even a client on the other end of his phone has Power (the capacity to intimidate others) but he’s not happy.

The reasons why so many rich people are miserable (and need more toys to retain even an acceptable level of happiness) is two-fold:

  • Money is other people, most people are useless parasites, so Money’s influence in your life is always to your detriment. This is true whether the issue is that you have too much or too little. Your best way to live well is to limit Money’s injection into your life as much as possible. This, unfortunately, means you need to have quite a bit of it, and be at a level that most people would consider “rich”, but it also requires that you spend it cautiously and make sure no one knows that you have it.
  • The quest for Power is endless. People who have that itch will never be satisfied. There are plenty of Kefka types out there who won’t stop until they’ve reduced the world to charred husk and are the last one to perish.

So, to answer this question: I’d say the best strategy (if you’re not rich) is:

  • Find something you enjoy doing, that pays well enough to build savings. You have a psychological need to work. Not working will wear on you. The only difference between being poor (meaning Silicon Valley poor, as in “has to work”, not actual poverty) and rich, then, is how much direction you have over what you work on. So keep looking until you find something that you’d do even if you had $150 million in the bank.
  • Save. A great job is nice, but shit changes. Managers come and go, companies get new executives and turn to shit, and sometimes you just want to change careers outright. You need savings so you aren’t worried about the day-to-day nonsense and insecurity that exist even in good companies.
  • Get rich slowly. Most of the VC-istan nonsense will just make you miserable, because most of the winners don’t deserve it and good people lose all the time. Most people who get “fuck you money” pass the event horizon slowly, through degrees.
Email This Page

Tesla Model S in Manhattan

Tesla Model S in Manhattan

Dec 9, 2012

I was walking in Chelsea area of Manhattan one day when I spotted a sleek-looking car from afar, when I got closer I realized it was a Tesla Model S which was recently released to the public. I went into the dealship right across the street and found out that to test-drive this beauty Tesla requires a $5000 fully-refundable deposit. It takes six month wait after the deposit for Tesla to contact the purchaser to begin customising the car to his liking. Sometime September 2013 Tesla will have leasing available as well.

Email This Page

Keyless entry using your phone

Keyless entry using your phone

Nov 21, 2012

I usually don’t talk about technology that promises its features before it actually comes out on the market, but this is a unique case. It is called Lockitron. The company has a prototype that works, according to their promo video below..


 

Email This Page

HOME OF THE BRAVE

HOME OF THE BRAVE

Oct 18, 2011

By: JOHN STEINVOLD

The Economists concede that economics is an inexact science. What does that mean? Perhaps it means their economic forecast is better than yours or mine. Recently, economic indicators have been rising and people have their fingers crossed. Economists have given us reason to hope that the job market will improve and that the stock market will continue on a steady climb. Yet, the newspapers continue to report more layoffs and more jobs going overseas.

Meanwhile, our economy is getting more and more complex. We associate complexity with progress for some ungodly reason. The following problems, however, have become inherent in our economy. What does that mean? It means they will be around for a while:

Needless poverty, unemployment, inflation, the threat of depression, taxes, crimes related to profit (sale of illicit drugs, stolen IDs, muggings, bribery, con artists, etc.), conflict of interest, endless red tape, a staggering national debt plus a widening budget deficit, 48 out of 50 states in debt, cities in debt, counties in debt, skyrocketing personal debts, 50% of Americans unhappy at their work, saving for retirement and our children’s education, health being a matter of wealth, competing in the “rat race”, the need for insurance, being a nation of litigation, being subject to the tremors on Wall Street, fear of downsizing and automation, fear of more Enrons, outsourcing, bankruptcies, crippling strikes, materialism, corruption, welfare, social security, sacrificing quality and safety in our products for the sake of profit, the social problem of the “haves” vs. the “havenots” and the inevitable family quarrels over money.

Have we become gluttons for punishment? My college professor once said, “You can get used to hanging if you live long enough!”

We Americans love our freedom; yet, we have allowed the use of money to completely dominate our way of life. Indeed, we are no longer a free people. We are 7.4 trillion dollars in debt. We live in fear of depression, inflation, inadequate medical coverage and losing our jobs. Our freedom is at stake if not our very survival. Yet, we put our collective heads in the sand.

Yes, there is something we can do. We can look into ourselves for an answer. We may find that we have the strength to carry out our internal economic affairs without the need to use money. Yes, we will still need to use money when dealing with other countries.

There is no question that a way of life without money will alleviate if not completely eliminate all of the previously mentioned problems. Yet, we scoff at the idea. We are totally convinced that money is a necessity. We cannot imagine life without money. Perhaps the time has come to think otherwise. It is completely obvious our present economy no longer satisfies our present day needs.

As individuals, we will gain complete economic freedom. In return, a way of life without money demands only that we, as individuals, do the work we love to do. It is a win/win situation. Let us consider the following arguments:

Can we learn to distribute our goods and services according to need (on an ongoing basis) rather than by the ability to pay? Why not? Poverty and materialism will be eliminated! Our sense of value will change. Wealth will no longer be a status symbol. A man will be judged by what he is; not by what he has. He will be judged by his achievements, leadership, ideas, artistic endeavours or athletic prowess; not by the size of his wallet.

Yes, everything will be free according to need. All the necessities and common luxuries will be available on a help yourself basis at the local store. Surely, this country is capable of supplying the necessities and common luxuries for everyone in this country many times over.

The more “expensive” items, such as housing, cars, boats, etc. would be provided for on a priority basis. For example, the homeless would be given housing ahead of those living in crowded quarters. How will this priority be established? Perhaps a local board elected by the people in the neighborhood such as a school board. Or perhaps the school boards could absorb this responsibility in addition to their present duties.

Since cooperation will replace competition, can government, industry and the people learn to work together as a team to meet the economic needs of our nation as well as each individual? Again, why not? Yes, competition is great; but cooperation is even better. Cooperation avoids duplication of effort. Wouldn’t it be more efficient to have everybody freely working together, sharing ideas, thoughts and technical knowledge? Patents and industrial secrets would be a thing of the past. Competition, however, will still be around. Individuals will still compete with their co-workers in ideas, achievements, leadership and getting promotions.

For example, Ford, Chrysler & GM would work together to build automobiles that are truly safe and efficient and environmentally friendly. Perhaps, with everyone working together, we can invent a car engine that would eliminate the need to import oil from the Middle East. (Note: Ford, Chrysler & GM would gradually become one entity.)

Unfortunately, what immediately jumps into the minds of most people is: “It simply won’t work!” The idea of a way of life without money is then dismissed without further thought. After all, what motivation is there for people to work if there is no paycheck? How can we possibly satisfy the labor needs of our nation? The following reasons are offered why people would be completely happy working in a way of life without money:

Today, only 50% of Americans enjoy their work. That will change. In a way of life without money, we will all be free to do the work we want to do or even love to do without any economic fear. We will be free to pursue our passion or as Joseph Campbell suggests we “follow our bliss”.

Cooperation will replace wasteful competition. We will all work together as a team. Work will become a way to help people, to meet people or to be part of something meaningful. It is a proven fact that people like to help one another. An esprit de corps will naturally build up and make work more enjoyable. Even the most menial task becomes easier when people work together. Yes, work will become more of a “togetherness” thing.

The profit motive will no longer be a hindrance to efficiency. There will be no need to sacrifice quality and safety in our products for the sake of profit. We will, like in the olden days, take pride in our work.

Yes, there is very likely to be a shortage of people volunteering to do the more menial tasks. One option is to offer “perks”. A perk can be of various forms such as front row season tickets to the opera or to his or her favorite sports team. Can you imagine an NBA basketball game where the celebrities are sitting in the back rows while the dishwashers and janitors are at courtside? (My apologies to Spike Lee & Jack Nicholson!) Or the perk could be the latest model boat or sports car which would not be immediately available to the public. Another option is to draft everyone once in their lifetime, to do a half year or so stint at a menial task. Perhaps a humbling experience is in order for all of us. It might serve us well in the area of character building.

Also, consider the fact that perhaps millions of people will be freed from jobs associated with the use of money. Millions more that are now unemployed or on welfare will also be available to help fill the labor needs of our country. Thus, we will have the work force necessary to do the work which is not economically feasible in our present economy such as cleaning our environment (land, sea & air), conservation, recycling, humanitarian work, research in medicine, education, science & space and now we can include national security.

Perhaps the most difficult problem is in the administration of a way of life without money. Can we learn to determine our economic needs, allocate our resources from the federal on down to the neighborhood levels? Perhaps some sort of economic bodies must be created to coordinate, monitor and carryout our economic needs. These economic bodies would exist similar to our governments, one for the federal, one for each state and one for each local level.

Yes, in order to administrate a way of life without money, economic bodies, boards or councils or whatever you wish to call them would be created to absorb economic responsibility from our various governments. They will interact and cooperate with one another to meet the economic needs of our country and of each individual. They will be empowered by Congress to tend to the economic needs of its constituents. Thus, a balance of power will be safely maintained.

Our federal needs, which would be similar to the federal budget we have today, will be resolved by an economic body comprised of representatives of the various branches of government, our industrial & labor resources, research (in medicine, education, science & space), our environment, conservation, importing & exporting, and now, national security and whatever facet of our way of life should be represented. This economic body will arrange for the labor and material resources necessary to meet the economic needs of our nation.

Similarly, the same will occur at the state and local levels. The economic body at the local levels will be responsible for providing services to the people in the neighborhood. If the labor needs cannot be met with volunteer workers, “perks” must be offered. Also, the economic body at the local levels will be responsible for keeping the stores stocked with food, clothing and the common luxuries which will be available free. Thus, the economic needs of the nation right on down to the neighborhood levels would be determined and satisfied by these economic bodies.

How much economic responsibility will these new bodies absorb from our federal, state and local governments? How much will be shared? Can a balance of power be maintained? At any rate, our federal, state and local governments will be relieved of considerable amount of economic responsibility. Thus, our various governments will be free to catch up on all the other domestic and foreign issues that face us.

Yes, we will still import and export goods with foreign countries as our needs dictate; but what money will be used in place of the almighty dollar? Would the dollar have any value if everything is free in the USA? Would that be a problem? We would, however, still be able to use the currency of the country we are doing business with. For example, if we export goods to Germany, we would accept marks or euros in payment. The euros would then be deposited in our national treasury for future use. The money could then be used to import goods or perhaps send Americans overseas on vacation.

Yes, a way of life without money could be compared to the kibbutz which now exist in Israel. Can you picture the USA as one big kibbutz? However, ownership of property will remain the same as it is today. Our government will remain the same. Our free enterprise system will remain in place as it is today. There will be no need for money or any substitute for money since everything will be free.

The advantages of a way of life without money stagger the imagination; but they are real and cannot be disputed. Perhaps it is time for us to grab the brass ring?

“The Human Race has improved everything except the Human Race.” Adlai Stevenson

Email This Page